![]() ![]() There could be information that compromises U.S. There’s a lot of stuff in that raw data that the Times apparently chose not to run. ![]() They also took steps to not publish documents that would compromise intelligence gathering. In terms of whether he’s colluding with Al Qaeda? They did not name names, beyond the Pakistani retired general who has been the subject of public discussion. I applaud the steps the New York Times has taken. ![]() All you can do is try to exercise due diligence. You’re trying to weigh, sitting in the editor’s chair, the public interest versus the government’s interest. ![]() The fact of the matter is you don’t know if you are going to endanger lives when you do something like this. Do you believe the government?įiedler: I don’t disbelieve the government. Tom Fiedler, dean of the College of Communication, says the move is a reminder of how far we’ve come from the world of the Pentagon Papers, which the Times and other papers made public in 1971.īU Today spoke with Fiedler (COM’71), a former editor of the Miami Herald, about the ethical implications of the increasing ease and speed of publishing sensitive material.īU Today: The government says WikiLeaks endangered lives with its disclosures. The Times and the two overseas publications obtained the document dump from WikiLeaks, an online publisher of leaked documents purporting to reveal government or corporate misbehavior. Yesterday, the New York Times, the Guardian, and Der Spiegel published a massive cache of papers suggesting, among other things, that Pakistan colluded with Al Qaeda while pocketing $1 billion in annual aid from American taxpayers. It has frustrated intelligence agencies’ efforts to halt the publication of embarrassing documents. There’s at least one good thing the internet has done for journalism. One victim says "you can never be free" until you reach out for help.Twitter Facebook Tom Fiedler says WikiLeaks is a “laundromat” for sensitive documents. Victims can call the confidential crisis line for help. If you have reason to believe abuse is taking place, err on the side of the child's safety. We learn some signs of sexual abuse, and how some may rationalize not acting when they suspect abuse. Viewers see children watch a puppet show about abuse. Create an environment in which children can be comfortable speaking about their emotions and experiences. We learn more about why children don't tell. Adult women share their regrets at having kept the secret. Joyce kept her abuser's secret until her father molested a neighbor's child. Rebuilding Shattered Trust (03:30)Ī single abuser may molest more than 60 children. Her mother was also a victim of abuse, which is now causing problems in her marriage. Now after counseling, she has begun to deal with her abuse. Viewers hear the story of a young girl who had been sexually abused numerous times by older neighbor boys. Most children don't realize how many people are available when they do come forward. "You do blame yourself." Danielle, a young girl, told a guidance counselor about her friend's abuse. Viewers see the mothers of abused children share their feelings about the abuse. The man fit the profile of a molester, and fled before sentencing. We hear videotaped courtroom testimony and learn the story of a teacher convicted of molesting his students. We learn why victims are unlikely to tell, and the importance of telling a trusted adult. Afraid to Tell (02:14)Ī young victim tells the story of near-rape by her father. This introduction provides excerpts of victims' stories and orients viewers to the demographics of sexual abuse: the victims, the perpetrators, and the conditions that make children most vulnerable. Introduction: No More Secrets (01:49) FREE PREVIEW ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |